德国政府将 3 万台 PC 迁移至 LibreOffice
German state moving 30k PCs to LibreOffice

原始链接: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2024/04/04/german-state-moving-30000-pcs-to-libreoffice/

德国北部石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州宣布计划将当地政府的 IT 基础设施从 Microsoft Windows 和 Office 迁移到 Linux 和 LibreOffice 等免费软件。 这一转变旨在将国家打造为数字先锋,确保独立、可持续性和安全。 通过采用开源软件,石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州打算更好地控制其数据和 IT 运营,避免潜在的数据泄露给外部实体。 “数字主权”的重要性在于公共管理部门在使用专有的封闭软件时需要重新获得对其数据和系统的控制。 欧洲数据保护主管此前曾指出欧盟委员会使用 Microsoft 365 有关数据隐私法的问题。 此外,使用免费和开源软件可以为地方政府节省成本、提高灵活性,并能够在不依赖单一供应商的情况下定制和调整软件以满足特定需求。 “公共资金,公共代码”倡议鼓励公共部门内使用开源软件的类似举措。

尽管担心数据主权和对美国技术的潜在依赖,微软还是决定将欧洲机构转向 Microsoft Office 和 Teams,这一决定可以追溯到 2000 年代初期。 最初,由于微软计划停止对旧版 Windows 操作系统的支持,德国主要城市之一的慕尼黑开始执行从专有软件迁移到开源替代品的使命。 然而,这段旅程充满挑战。 处理能力极低的旧台式机硬件、互联网连接速度慢以及与开源软件的兼容性差都构成了重大障碍。 此外,许多重要的应用程序仍然是 Windows 独有的。 资金不足、人员不足的开发和维护团队在应对这些挑战时面临着许多困难。 政治压力,包括来自支持微软的市长的压力,进一步阻碍了进展。 尽管声称这一改变并非出于政治动机,但这一决定最终还是有利于 Microsoft Office 和 Teams。 从那时起,采用 LibreOffice 等开源解决方案的努力仍在继续,关于它们是否适合大规模企业使用的争论仍在继续。 虽然支持者认为标准化在降低成本和加强协作方面具有优势,但批评者强调了灵活性的丧失和潜在的兼容性问题。 尽管面临挑战,教育等一些行业已经成功实施了开源替代方案。 与此同时,Gaia-X 和石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州等举措旨在汇集资源并开发一个强大的、相互关联的生态系统。 总之,在欧洲广泛采用开源办公套件的道路仍然不确定,每个国家都采取自己的方法。 时间将会揭晓哪些解决方案会取得胜利。 然而,国家间的合作,加上充足的资金和对应对挑战的持续关注,可以为成功的大规模实施铺平道路。
相关文章

原文

German state moving 30,000 PCs to LibreOffice

Following a successful pilot project, the northern German federal state of Schleswig-Holstein has decided to move from Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office to Linux and LibreOffice (and other free and open source software) on the 30,000 PCs used in the local government. As reported on the homepage of the Minister-President:

Independent, sustainable, secure: Schleswig-Holstein will be a digital pioneer region and the first German state to introduce a digitally sovereign IT workplace in its state administration. With a cabinet decision to introduce the open-source software LibreOffice as the standard office solution across the board, the government has given the go-ahead for the first step towards complete digital sovereignty in the state, with further steps to follow.

The term digital sovereignty is very important here. If a public administration uses proprietary, closed software that can’t be studied or modified, it is very difficult to know what happens to users’ data:

We have no influence on the operating processes of such [proprietary] solutions and the handling of data, including a possible outflow of data to third countries. As a state, we have a great responsibility towards our citizens and companies to ensure that their data is kept safe with us and we must ensure that we are always in control of the IT solutions we use and that we can act independently as a state.

This follows on from the finding by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) that the European Commission’s use of Microsoft 365 breaches data protection law.

In addition, there is this question: Why should local governments use taxpayers’ money to buy proprietary, closed software from a single vendor? With LibreOffice and free software, administrations have much more choice where to get the software and support, and can fund local developers to make improvements. In addition, local governments can maintain full control of the software, study its source code, make changes they require and deploy it entirely on their own infrastructure. Learn more about “Public Money, Public Code”.

So we welcome the decision in Schleswig-Holstein to move its IT administration to free and open source software, for all the benefits it brings, both for the local government and the almost three million citizens of the state.

Full statement from the State Chancellery here (in German)

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com