拜耳股价大涨,此前最高法院推翻了数千起“农达”诉讼案背后的核心法律理论。
Bayer Stock Soars After Supreme Court Guts Core Legal Theory Behind 1000s Of Roundup Cases

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/bayer-erupts-most-23-years-after-supreme-court-guts-core-legal-theory-behind-1000s-roundup

拜耳公司(Bayer AG)股价飙升 20%,创下自 2003 年以来的最大盘中涨幅。此前,美国最高法院就其旗下的农达(Roundup)除草剂案件作出有利于公司的裁决。最高法院以 7 比 2 的投票结果,推翻了一项针对拜耳的 125 万美元赔偿裁决。此前,一名消费者指控该产品导致其患上非霍奇金淋巴瘤。 大法官布雷特·卡瓦诺(Brett Kavanaugh)在代表多数派撰写的意见书中指出,联邦法律优先于州级的“未履行警告义务”诉讼。由于美国环保署(EPA)此前已裁定农达产品的标签无需标注致癌警告,因此州政府强制要求的额外标签内容在法律上与联邦规定不符。 这一裁决是拜耳自 2018 年以 630 亿美元收购孟山都公司以来,在长期法律纠纷中取得的重大胜利。尽管拜耳此前已为集体诉讼预留了数十亿美元的赔偿金,并已在消费者版本的农达中停止使用草甘膦,但这一裁决仍可能对总额约 7.87 亿美元的现有诉讼产生影响。最终,该裁决确立了消费者不得因拜耳未标注联邦监管机构认为不必要的致癌警告而对其提起诉讼。

相关文章

原文

Bayer AG shares soared in Frankfurt on Thursday morning after the Supreme Court sided with the German pharmaceutical and life sciences giant in a major Roundup ruling expected to block thousands of lawsuits alleging it failed to warn consumers that the weedkiller could cause cancer.

Bloomberg reported that the Supreme Court voted 7 - 2 to throw out a $1.25 million jury verdict won by Missouri resident John Durnell, who blamed years of Roundup exposure for his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the majority that federal law "demands" uniform pesticide labels and that the state-law "failure-to-warn" claim at issue in the case "would require a cancer warning on Roundup's label, a requirement 'in addition to' and 'different from' the label required by EPA."

Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The ruling is a major milestone in Bayer's years-long court battle over Roundup, which it acquired from Monsanto for $63 billion in 2018. The company has since stopped using glyphosate in Roundup products sold at major retailers.

Earlier this year, Bayer announced a proposed $7.25 billion class action settlement to resolve tens of thousands of current and future lawsuits.

Shares of Bayer soared 20%...

...marking the largest intraday gain since March 2003.

Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Holly Froum wrote in a note before the high court ruling that about $787 million in existing Roundup verdicts could be affected by the decision.

To sum up, the high court ruled that consumers cannot sue Bayer over the absence of a cancer warning on Roundup labels because federal regulators had already concluded that such a warning was not required.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com