Stack Overflow 的论坛虽已死,但这家公司依然活着。
Stack Overflow’s forum is dead but the company’s still kicking

原始链接: https://sherwood.news/tech/stack-overflow-forum-dead-thanks-ai-but-companys-still-kicking-ai/

Stack Overflow 曾是开发者获取知识的权威中心,如今正面临公众论坛参与度严重下滑的困境,其流量正被 ChatGPT 和 Copilot 等生成式 AI 工具所蚕食。月度提问量已骤降至 2008 年的水平,引发了外界对于该网站正面临“被大语言模型(LLM)取代”的担忧。 然而,尽管公众论坛的影响力在减弱,该公司在财务上依然稳健。通过摆脱对广告的依赖,Stack Overflow 的年收入已翻倍至 1.15 亿美元。目前,它正通过向 AI 开发商授权数据,以及销售企业级生成式 AI 解决方案“Stack Internal”(目前有 2.5 万家企业使用)来挖掘其海量人工精选存档的价值。 首席执行官 Prashanth Chandrasekar 认为,对于大语言模型难以解决的复杂、微妙的技术问题,该网站依然不可或缺。通过将历史存储库转型为高价值数据资源,Stack Overflow 已成功从一个公共问答论坛转型为 AI 时代以 B2B 为核心的关键基础设施提供商。该公司成为了老牌内容平台如何通过将其专业知识商品化,从而在威胁其原有模式的技术浪潮中生存甚至蓬勃发展的典范。

近期 Hacker News 上的讨论凸显了一种共识:Stack Overflow 正处于衰落的终局,而这不仅源于大语言模型(LLM)的兴起,更归因于长期以来的文化转变。 尽管许多用户认可该网站的历史价值,但他们认为其最终的崩塌是咎由自取。多年来,该平台曾经追求质量的初衷演变成了一种“严苛”的审核机制。用户经常反映,那种吹毛求疵的“把关”行为、过度使用“因重复而关闭”的裁定,以及对新手问题充满敌意、阻碍社区参与的环境,令他们倍感挫折。 人工智能的出现成为了最终的催化剂,它提供了即时且不带偏见的答案,使得该网站那种对抗性的问答模式显得过时。批评者指出,虽然大语言模型偶尔会产生幻觉,但对开发者而言,它们提供了阻力最小的路径。 更深层的担忧在于技术知识“公共广场”的丧失。随着社区驱动的验证机制逐渐消失,整个生态系统面临着失去细微差别、多元视角以及同行评审解决方案的风险——而这些曾是软件开发集体智慧的定义所在。许多评论者现在认为,该平台唯一存续的途径是转型为类似维基百科的非营利性、社区维护模式,而非继续作为营利性实体存在。
相关文章

原文

When Elon Musk described Stack Overflow’s plight as “death by LLM” in July 2023, he wasn’t exaggerating.

Having been the go-to resource for developers looking for technical help for a long time, Stack Overflow neared the peak of its powers during the pandemic, with coders seeking the evergreen information on the company’s popular Q&A forum. But amid a wave of powerful code-writing AI assistants like ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude, Google’s Gemini, and Microsoft’s Copilot, traffic to the site has plummeted.

Last month, Stack Overflow recorded just 6,866 questions — roughly equal to the typical volume when the site first launched back in 2008.

Sherwood News

But while Stack Overflow the Q&A forum looks dead, Stack Overflow the company looks to be limping along.

Unlike Chegg and other knowledge hubs that have fallen victim to generative AI, Stack Overflow has found a way to monetize its enormous back catalog of content. Indeed, even with engagement falling off a cliff since ChatGPT’s 2022 debut, the company’s annual revenue has roughly doubled to $115 million. Losses have slimmed, too, from $84 million in FY2023 to $22 million as of the last fiscal year, as desperate cost-cutting efforts, including mass layoffs, helped boost the bottom line.

Once dependent on ads across its buzzy forum, Stack Overflow now primarily makes money from enterprise solutions like “Stack Internal,” which provides a generative-AI add-on powered by the millions of questions and answers on the site through the years. Stack Internal is now used by 25,000 companies around the world. It also licenses its data to AI companies, in a Reddit-like model — a platform that made more than $200 million from licensing user-generated content in 2024. 

Put simply, Stack Overflows new niche is the trust built by its old community and their expertise. In the words of CEO Prashanth Chandrasekar last December:

...when we saw the questions decline in early 2023, what we realized is that pretty much all those declines were with very simple questions. The complex questions still get asked on Stack because there’s no other place. If the LLMs are only as good as the data, which is typically human curated, we’re one of the best places for that, if not the best for technology.

Large language models want data about coding problems and how to solve them. Stack Overflow has a big digital warehouse full of that, but it’s increasingly aging, as queries move into private chat windows with LLM models... which need huge chunks of data to work. Stack Overflow has become a fascinating canary in tech’s new, circular coal mine.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com