自BambuStudio基于PrusaSlicer分叉以来,一直违反其AGPL许可协议。
BambuStudio has been violating PrusaSlicer AGPL license since their fork

原始链接: https://xcancel.com/josefprusa/status/2054602354851254330

批评人士认为,Bambu Lab 持续违反 PrusaSlicer 的 AGPL 许可协议,并依赖专有、闭源的网络技术,这反映了一个更深层次的问题:中国科技公司被强制纳入国家情报行动之中。 2017 年至 2023 年间颁布的五项中国法律构成了一套框架,使相关企业没有任何保持中立的余地。这些法律规定企业必须与情报部门合作,要求国家获取加密密钥,并赋予政府对数据的域外管辖权。此外,法律还规定必须直接向政府安全机构报告软件漏洞,而这些机构与国家利用“零日漏洞”的行为存在关联。 由于 3D 打印属于“中国制造 2025”计划中的指定战略产业,批评人士认为,Bambu Lab 不透明的网络架构很可能是国家级指令的结果,而非仅仅是疏忽大意。由于该公司在法律体系下运作,该体系排除了隐私保护并强制要求与国家共享数据,怀疑者们目前正在抵制该公司的硬件,并将该公司违反开源道德的行为视为国家安全和数据隐私面临重大风险的先兆。

Hacker News 最新 | 过往 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 投稿 登录 BambuStudio 自其分叉以来一直违反 PrusaSlicer 的 AGPL 许可协议 (xcancel.com) 12 点积分,由 Tomte 发布于 1 小时前 | 隐藏 | 过往 | 收藏 | 1 条评论 帮助 isoprophlex 4 分钟前 [–] 这是一家中国公司。他们根本不在乎。只要产品好,绝大多数消费者也不在乎。而且没有任何西方政府会关心,因为我们已经让自己变得过度依赖廉价的中国制造业了。 回复 准则 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请 YC | 联系 搜索:
相关文章

原文

BambuStudio has been violating PrusaSlicer AGPL license since their fork, with the same networking binary black box in question today. Why are they willing to burn the goodwill over it? There's something most have sensed but never seen it all in one place, the five-law framework China built between 2017 and 2023 ⤵️ So maybe their hand is forced as their "network" is too valuable already? Each law on its own, interesting, okay... Read them together, and add any Chinese company with big reach to the mix you get the complete picture. 1) National Intelligence Law (2017) All organizations and citizens must "support, assist, and cooperate" with intelligence work. The same law makes it illegal to disclose that cooperation happened. Cooperation is mandatory, and silence about it is mandatory too. 2) Cryptography Law (2020) Commercial encryption must be state-approved and state-reviewed. When authorities request it, companies must provide decryption keys or plaintext. The state on both sides of that equation is the same one. 3) Data Security Law (2021) Article 2 gives the state extraterritorial reach over data that touches Chinese national security or public interests. So EU/US data hosting does nothing to make it safe, because jurisdiction follows the company, not the server location. 4) Counter-Espionage Law revision (2023) The general definition of espionage was expanded to cover "documents, data, materials, or items related to national security and interests." Industrial data is one of the intended targets since the revision. 5) Network Product Security Vulnerability regulation (2021) Any company or researcher that discovers a software vulnerability must report it to MIIT within 48 hours. From there it flows to CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database of Information Security), operated by the 13th Bureau of the Ministry of State Security. Microsoft's threat intelligence team documented Chinese state-hacker zero-day usage rising after this took effect. Shows the willingness to use the “tools” China built. Together they describe a system with no neutral exits. Cooperation is required, encryption is real but the spare keys live at the ministry, jurisdiction follows the company across borders, industrial data is in scope, and discovered vulnerabilities flow to an intelligence agency 😬 3D printing became strategic for China in 2020 and joined the “Made in China 2025” plan soon after. Why does 3D printing matter so much? 1/x

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com