联邦公开市场委员会后的想法:股市似乎再次表现得像“臭佬”
Post-FOMC Thoughts: Stocks Seem To Be Behaving Like "Stonks" Again

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/post-fomc-thoughts-stocks-seem-be-behaving-stonks-again

Academy Securities 的 Peter Tchir 撰写的这篇文章讨论了联邦公开市场委员会 (FOMC) 的最新决定及其对金融市场的影响。 在将 FOMC 对 2024 年利率的中值预测不变解释为由于预测利率分布的变化而导致三次降息后,Tchir 强调了两个关键点: 首先,平均预测发生重大变化,从 4.7% 降至 4.81%,只有一位参与者预计降息四次,而不是去年 12 月预期的五到六次。 此外,2025 年的中值预测显示降息次数减少,暗示与立即的宽松周期相比,将采取“长期更高”的方式。 其次,会后新闻发布会的重要性以及美联储承认可能很快放缓量化紧缩(QT)的步伐。 尽管对通胀的担忧依然存在,但参与者的普遍共识似乎是担心落后于通胀曲线。 新闻发布会结束后,降息预期显着上升,尤其是在 6 月份,尽管这种增长可能并不完全合理。 在基准 10 年期国债的带动下,美国国债(尤其是长期债券)的收益率预计将再次上升。 尽管市场波动较大,但奇尔仍对股票表现持怀疑态度,理由是围绕大幅抛售的潜在催化剂存在持续的不确定性。

相关文章

原文

By Peter Tchir of Academy Securities

In the Old Days…  

Today would have been easy, in the old days, where we got a summary of projections (aka “the dot plot”) and no press conference.

The bond market (and stocks) both interpreted the “unchanged” in median for dots for 2024 as a sign the Fed was committed to 3 cuts.

Two things immediately popped out to me:

  1. The average went from 4.7% to 4.81% as the distribution changed dramatically. Only 1 person thought there should be 4 cuts, as opposed to December when 5 thought more than 3 cuts, including one member who had 6 cuts.
  2. In 2025 the median priced out one less cut and the average moved 17 bps higher. Not in the end of the world, but closer to higher for longer, than a quick easing cycle.

Under normal circumstances, would have said to fade initial reaction, but nowadays, it all comes down to the presser, which is where all the “fun” is.

Balance Sheet Reduction           

The Fed admitted they are getting closer to slowing the pace of quantitative tightening (QT). This makes sense, as I’m told there is a limit to how small their balance sheet can get (due to bank reserves, I believe). So it shouldn’t be a surprise and sounds like something we might get more information at next meeting. It would, in my opinion, be easier “politically” to shrink QT into the election, rather than cutting rates.

Should be a positive for risk assets and yields, though balance sheet run-off seems to have been less impactful than large scale asset purchases, where they bought duration, having a far bigger impact than just letting debt mature and not buying more.

Lags and Belief in Inflation Being Under Control

The cutting argument, now seems to largely be based on the belief/hope that inflation is coming down and will continue to come down, despite some recent higher than expected prints. They are definitely worried that if they don’t cut now, they might be behind the curve. The case to cut seems more about lag time and risks of moving too late, rather than strong conviction things are under control (different tone than the December meeting).

What Now

As the press conference finishes, we’ve moved up timing of cuts (June almost certain) and back to more than 3 cuts this year. The former makes sense, the latter less so.

The 30-year bond has a slightly higher yield on the day (that seemed to move in the “right” direction) given all the noise and comments.

Dollar down (not hawkish Fed), bitcoin and stocks higher! Stocks seem to like discussion about QT and rate cuts (though since they are “long duration assets”, not sure why they quite as responsive as they are).

Another day of watching some market leaders trade somewhere in between meme stocks and ARKK, circa 2021.

Maybe this was the “all-clear” we need to take Nasdaq 100 to new highs? Except, we are kind of left more data dependent than it felt back in December.

I expect bond yields, which “survived” the potentially very dovish Fed, to resume their march higher (led by 10s and longer).

Maybe I’m being stubborn, but stocks seem to be behaving like “stonks” again, but not sure what pushes them out of what has become a range, while I can still see many things leading to a sharp, rapid pullback.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com