最大公共医院系统首席执行官表示,他已准备好用人工智能取代放射科医生。
CEO Of Largest Public Hospital System Says He's Ready To Replace Radiologists With AI

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/ceo-largest-public-hospital-system-says-hes-ready-replace-radiologists-ai

纽约市公共医院系统首席执行官米切尔·卡茨表示,一旦法规允许,他准备用人工智能取代放射科医生,理由是在成像需求不断增加的情况下,可能节省成本。他设想人工智能处理初步图像读取——特别是乳腺X光检查和X光片——放射科医生则专注于标记的异常情况,从而可能增加乳腺癌筛查等服务的可及性。 韦斯特彻斯特医疗中心的大卫·卢巴斯基报告称,人工智能的实施取得了成功,声称其在初步乳腺癌筛查中“比人类更好”,假阴性率非常低。多位医院首席执行官一致认为,允许人工智能独立读取图像的法规变化将是“革命性的”,尤其对安全网医院而言。 然而,放射科医生强烈批评了这些言论,认为目前的人工智能尚不具备独立诊疗能力,这种转变将危及患者安全。担忧集中在医院管理者将削减成本置于患者安全之上,并可能被人工智能公司误导。

相关文章

原文

By Marty Stempniak of Radiology Business,

The chief executive of America’s largest public hospital system says he is prepared to start replacing radiologists with artificial intelligence in some circumstances, once the regulatory landscape catches up. 

Mitchell H. Katz, MD, president and CEO of NYC Health + Hospitals, recently spoke during a panel discussion held by Crain’s New York Business. The trained internal medicine specialist noted how AI is increasingly being used to interpret mammograms and X-rays. 

This presents an opportunity to save on how much hospitals spend on radiologists, who have become more costly amid rising demand for imaging, Crain’s reported Thursday. 

We could replace a great deal of radiologists with AI at this moment, if we are ready to do the regulatory challenge,” Katz said at the forum, held on March 25. 

Katz—who has led the 11-hospital organization since 2018—said he sees great potential for AI to increase access to breast cancer screening. Hospitals could potentially produce “major savings” by letting the technology handle first reads, with radiologists then double-checking any abnormal screenings. 

Fellow panelist David Lubarsky, MD, MBA, president and CEO of the Westchester Medical Center Health Network, said his system is already seeing great success in deploying such technology. The AI Westchester uses misses very few breast cancers and is “actually better than human beings,” he told the audience.

“For women who aren’t considered high risk, if the test comes back negative, it’s wrong only about 3 times out of 10,000,” Lubarsky said. 

Katz asked fellow hospital CEOs if there is any reason why they shouldn’t be pushing for changes to New York state regulations, allowing AI to read images “without a radiologist,” Crain’s reported. In this scenario, rads could then provide second opinions, if AI flags any images as abnormal. Sandra Scott, MD, CEO of the One Brooklyn Health, a small hospital facing tight margins, agreed with this line of thinking, according to Crain’s. 

“I mean, I’m in charge of a safety-net institution. It would be a game-changer,” Scott said about AI being used to replace rads. 

The discussion comes after Dario Amodei, PhD, CEO of Anthropic, recently made similar statements about artificial intelligence replacing rads. In a podcast interview, he falsely stated that AI has taken over the specialty’s core function, allowing doctors to focus more on the human side of the job. Radiologists roundly criticized Amodei’s remarks. Mohammed Suhail, MD, a San Diego-based rad with North Coast Imaging, said the same about Katz’s comments on Monday. 

“Undeniable proof that confidently uninformed hospital administrators are a danger to patients: easily duped by AI companies that are nowhere near capable of providing patient care,” Suhail told Radiology Business. “Any attempt to implement AI-only reads would immediately result in patient harm and death, and only someone with zero understanding of radiology would say something so naive. But in some sense, they’re correct: Hospitals are happy to cut costs even if it means patient harm, as long as it’s legal.”

* * * 

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com