对50款苹果产品进行排名
Rank the 50 best Apple products

原始链接: https://www.theverge.com/cs/tech/900477/apple-50-anniversary-rank-products

该系统通过利用社区输入,而非个人详尽列表,有效地对50个项目进行排名。它使用了一种改进的ELO算法——最初用于国际象棋——项目两两配对并根据用户偏好“竞争”。 每个项目都从一个分数开始,并在每次比较后进行调整。击败排名较高的项目会带来更大的分数增长,而击败排名较低的项目则惩罚较小。ELO算法经过调整,以最大程度地减少意外偏好变化的影响,承认“偏好”不如国际象棋比赛的胜利那样确定。 本质上,用户在两个项目之间的每一次选择都有助于动态的、社区驱动的排名。这种方法使大规模排名项目易于管理,并反映了集体意见。

一个黑客新闻的讨论围绕着《The Verge》的文章,该文章对苹果的50个最佳产品进行了排名。用户们分享他们对这个列表的反应,一些人质疑它的相关性,特别是对于那些最近加入苹果生态系统的人。 一些评论者争论具体的排名,比如初代iPad和iPad 2,争论市场影响力和产品本身的改进哪个应该更优先考虑。另一些人指出该列表大量包含老产品,建议对于不熟悉苹果历史的人来说,一个“跳过”选项可能会很有用。 虽然有些人觉得排名合理,但总体情绪表明该列表迎合的是一个对苹果整个产品历史非常熟悉的特定受众。这场讨论突出了人们对创新和各种苹果产品的持久影响的不同看法。
相关文章

原文

For any one person, ranking 50 items can be a long and tedious process. For a community, however, it's markedly easier. Rather than have each user submit a full list, we can break down the rankings into bite-size components, then recombine them once we have enough votes. Here, we're using a modified ELO algorithm to do just that.

With ELO, each item has a starting score, which is then modified in every paired matchup. The change in points is based on the score of the other item in the pairing; beating the top ranked item will come with a higher reward than beating the lowest, and the same in reverse applies to the penalties for losing. (ELO was originally developed for chess, which has more robust victory conditions than 'user preference,' so we've tweaked the standard version to dampen the effects of major upsets.)

All of which means that every time you make a choice between any two of the items on our Apple Top 50 list, you're making a contribution to the overall community rankings. Thanks!

  • Design: Kristen Radtke
  • Engineer: Graham MacAree
  • Editors: Nilay Patel, David Pierce, Meredith Haggerty
  • Concept: Victoria Barrios, Travis Larchuk
  • Copy edit: Kallie Plagge
联系我们 contact @ memedata.com