资深欧洲记者因使用人工智能生成的引言而被停职。
Senior European journalist suspended over AI-generated quotes

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/20/mediahuis-suspends-senior-journalist-over-ai-generated-quotes

彼得·范德梅尔什,Mediahuis(《De Telegraaf》和《Irish Independent》的出版商)的高级记者,因承认在Substack通讯中使用ChatGPT等人工智能工具伪造引言而被停职。范德梅尔什承认依赖人工智能生成的摘要,而未核实其准确性,导致发表了归因于个人的虚假陈述。 Mediahuis的《NRC》的调查显示存在“数十个”不准确的引言,七个人证实他们从未说过被归于他们的言论。范德梅尔什承认了自己的错误,表示他“错误地替人说话”,并且未能提供必要的人工监督——而他本人一直积极倡导这种做法。 Mediahuis强调其严格的人工智能使用政策,要求勤勉和透明,并已删除受影响的文章。这起事件凸显了人工智能在新闻业中未经检查使用的风险,即使范德梅尔什仍然相信人工智能在负责任地使用时可以*改善*报道。

黑客新闻 新 | 过去 | 评论 | 提问 | 展示 | 招聘 | 提交 登录 资深欧洲记者因AI生成引用被停职 (theguardian.com) 16点 由 Brajeshwar 1小时前 | 隐藏 | 过去 | 收藏 | 讨论 帮助 指南 | 常见问题 | 列表 | API | 安全 | 法律 | 申请YC | 联系方式 搜索:
相关文章

原文

The publisher of the Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf and the Irish Independent has suspended one of its senior journalists after he admitted using AI to “wrongly put words into people’s mouths”.

Peter Vandermeersch, the former head of the Irish operations at Mediahuis, said he “fell into the trap of hallucinations” – the term for AI-generated errors – when using the technology.

Vandermeersch, a fellow of “journalism and society” at the European publishing group, has been suspended from his role.

The experienced journalist said he had summarised reports using AI tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google’s NotebookLM, and not checked whether the quotes from those summaries were accurate. He subsequently published them in his Substack newsletter.

The errors were highlighted by an investigation by one of Mediahuis’s own titles, NRC, where Vandermeersch had been editor-in-chief in the 2010s. NRC alleged Vandermeersch had published “dozens” of quotes that were false and that seven quoted individuals in his posts said they had not made the statements attributed to them.

“I wrongly put words into people’s mouths, when I should have presented them as paraphrases. In some cases, it reflected my interpretation of their words. That was not just careless – it was wrong,” Vandermeersch wrote in a Substack post headlined “I am admitting my mistake”.

Vandermeersch added: “It is particularly painful that I made precisely the mistake I have repeatedly warned colleagues about: these language models are so good that they produce irresistible quotes you are tempted to use as an author. Of course, I should have verified them. The necessary ‘human oversight’, which I consistently advocate, fell short.”

Vandermeersch’s Press and Democracy blog writes regularly about “the vital connection between a free press and a healthy democracy”.

In a statement, the Mediahuis group’s chief executive, Gert Ysebaert, said: “At Mediahuis we apply strict rules for the use of AI, where diligence, human oversight and transparency are essential. The fact that these principles were not followed runs counter to the standards we uphold and to our commitment to readers that we stand for reliable journalism. We are discussing this with Peter Vandermeersch and have decided to temporarily suspend him from his role as fellow.’’

Mediahuis has also removed a number of articles written by Vandermeersch from the Irish Independent website.

AI tools such as ChatGPT are used by hundreds of millions of people for an array of tasks ranging from the relatively straightforward, such as suggesting recipes, to carrying out complex academic research. However, they are prone to making errors.

Vandermeersch said he made a second mistake by failing to correct false quotes immediately, instead leaving that work to a title he had overseen for nearly a decade. He said he was enthusiastic about the possibilities of AI and had wanted to experiment with them extensively.

“Journalism is human work,” he wrote. “I remain convinced that AI can be a powerful tool – one that can help journalism become better, dig deeper, and be more precise. But not by using AI in the way I did in the early months of this blog.”

Vandermeersch declined to comment.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com