能源成本上涨可能最终影响所有行业。
Rising Energy Costs May Hit All Sectors Eventually

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/rising-energy-costs-may-hit-all-sectors-eventually

## 中东冲突:无安全港 中东地区紧张局势升级,在以色列袭击伊朗以及伊朗随后对该地区的反击之后,正在造成大范围的不稳定,投资者和地区行为者都缺乏安全的避风港。伊朗的行动似乎旨在制造混乱或引诱美国介入,但反而可能促使沙特阿拉伯和卡塔尔等邻国更接近美国和以色列。 这场冲突威胁着全球能源安全,特别是通过霍尔木兹海峡,促使美国提供油轮护航——尽管这种保护的程度尚不清楚。中国面临两难:升级局势以转移美国注意力,还是合作以确保能源流动。 市场主要将这场冲突视为通胀风险,导致对更紧货币政策的预期——美联储和英国央行减少降息,甚至欧洲央行可能加息。欧元区最近的通胀数据超出预期也加剧了这一情况。因此,股市正在下跌,韩国KOSPI等指数已经出现大幅下跌。 传统的避险资产,如黄金,表现不佳,而美元流动性受到青睐。各国政府可能会干预以缓解能源价格飙升,但有限的财政空间构成挑战,影响主权债券。局势仍然高度不稳定,没有明确的缓和路径。

相关文章

原文

By Bas van Geffen, Senior Macro Strategist at Rabobank

Nowhere To Run

There don't appear to be many safe havens as the situation in Middle East continues to evolve. Not in markets, and not in the region either. At the time of writing, Israel has launched a new strike on Iran. And the US is considering arming Kurdish forces, trying to convince them to take part in a ground offensive against the regime.

Iran, meanwhile, has retaliated not only against the US and Israel, but against various countries in the region and against both military and civilian targets. Maybe this is simply an attempt to sow more chaos as the Iranian regime feels it is on its last legs. Or, perhaps, this is an attempt to convince its neighbors to appeal to the US to stop further operations; a signal that more of these attacks may happen if the US doesn’t.

Yet, if this was the plan, then it has backfired. Iran may have drawn its neighbors into the conflict – and they may side with the US instead. Saudi Arabia may attack Iran soon, Qatar reportedly already has. That’s quite the shift: it effectively sees them side with Israel in this conflict.

Iran’s strikes have reached as far as Cyprus, which means the EU is now involved too – if its energy security wasn’t a reason yet. However, European leaders remain divided on how to deal with the situation. The UK, Greece and France are scrambling to bolster Cyprus’ defences. Elsewhere, Spain has denied the US access to its military bases for air strikes.

That angered President Trump, who has threatened to cut trade ties with Spain. This follows on his Greenland threats earlier this year, and the recalibration of the US tariff structure after the Supreme Court invalidated many of Trump’s original tariffs.

The spat also raises the question whether the US is willing to protect European ships, or ships headed for the continent. President Trump has announced that the navy will escort tankers and freighters through the Strait of Hormuz, as a surge in petrol prices adds to US inflation fears. However, does that protection apply to all ships, or just to US allies? And does the EU have the capacity to protect its own tankers, if necessary? A French carrier does not suffice, but Europe does have some other assets in the area already. In fact, the US may lack the required assets, such as minesweepers, implying it may need its allies to back its pledge with the required muscle.

The effective shuttering of the Strait of Hormuz also poses a dilemma for China. What options does the country have? Escalate too, in order to distract the US and draw it away from the region? Or will Beijing work with Washington to end the conflict as quickly as possible and/or to safeguard energy flows through the Strait?

The longer world leaders take to effectively reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the more backlogs in energy supplies will build. So, thus far, markets have largely traded the Middle East war as an inflation risk. Money markets across the globe priced in tighter monetary policy – in the case of the Fed and Bank of England that means fewer rate cuts are being priced, but EUR money markets are now pricing in around 40% odds that the ECB may have to hike rates before the end of the year.

The inflation shock in the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Ukraine is clearly still in peoples’ minds. And yesterday’s Eurozone inflation data probably did not help either. At 1.9% y/y in February, the inflation rate still ran slightly below the ECB’s target, but prices rose faster than the 1.7% that had been expected – and that’s before any real disruptions to energy supplies. We estimate that recent energy price increases could add about 0.5pp to Eurozone inflation. This would see inflation average 2.3% this year, instead of undershooting the ECB’s target.

But if monetary policymakers do prioritize the inflation risks, where does that leave the economic outlook? Equity markets were deeply in the red yesterday, and a 12% drop in the Korean KOSPI index today suggests that global equity markets may not have bottomed out yet.

Rising energy costs may hit all sectors eventually, and aluminium and fertilizer prices are already being affected. But energy-hungry AI data centers are another key sector that comes to mind.

Governments may step in to shield households and companies from surging energy prices, like they did a couple of years ago. However, that will weigh on public finances, while fiscal space is already limited. Long-term sovereign bonds have taken a hit as a result, both in terms of outright yields, and in terms of swap spreads.

And in other markets, too, there appears to be little to no escape. Traditional safe havens, like gold, are not playing their usual part. Curiously, the metal has fallen 5% from its intraday peak at the start of this week. Considering the sharp appreciation of the DXY index, dollar liquidity appears to be king.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com