“他们不是MAGA阵营”:特朗普就塔克·卡尔森和梅根·凯利对伊朗的批评发表评论。
'They're Not MAGA': Trump Remarks On Tucker Carlson And Megyn Kelly's Iran Criticism

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/theyre-not-maga-trump-remarks-tucker-carlson-and-megyn-kellys-iran-criticism

特朗普总统直接回应了保守派媒体人士,如塔克·卡尔森和梅根·凯利,对近期打击伊朗目标行动的批评。卡尔森和凯利都质疑美国介入的必要性,认为这些行动主要使以色列受益,并可能使美国卷入另一场旷日持久的冲突,凯利甚至声称美国军人为了外国利益而牺牲。 特朗普坚定地捍卫了他的行动,认为这对于防止伊朗发展核武器和优先保障美国安全至关重要——这是“让美国再次伟大”运动的核心原则。他驳斥了批评,表示“MAGA希望看到我们的国家繁荣和安全”,并断言卡尔森和凯利观点不代表他的支持者。 政府,包括JD Vance等官员,强调这次行动不同于过去的干预,是基于对*迫在眉睫*威胁的情报。这场辩论凸显了保守派圈子内部对美国外交政策的分歧,以及在防止扩散和避免局势升级之间的平衡。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Steve Watson via modernity.news,

President Donald Trump delivered a clear message to critics within conservative media circles Monday, asserting that ‘true’ MAGA supporters back his moves to neutralize the Iranian threat and prevent nuclear proliferation that endangers the U.S. and its allies.

Dismissing pushback from Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly as out of step with America First priorities, Trump emphasized that securing the homeland against rogue regimes like Iran is non-negotiable—no matter the noise from sidelined commentators.

Tucker Carlson has publicly blamed Israel for pulling the U.S. into conflict with Iran, framing the strikes as unnecessary foreign entanglement rather than a direct defense of American interests.

In a recent segment, Carlson stated, “It’s hard to say this, but the United States didn’t make the decision here. Benjamin Netanyahu did.” He added, “This happened because Israel wanted it to happen. This is Israel’s war. This is not the United States war.”

Carlson questioned the long-standing warnings about Iran’s nuclear program, asking, “Why would Israel want this?” and concluding, “Benjamin Netanyahu said yesterday, Iran’s nuclear program has been on the very verge, ‘the cusp’ of building and deploying a nuclear weapon.” He dismissed the urgency, saying, “But if it was really about that, how could this threat have lasted for 40 years?” before claiming the goal is “regional hegemony. Super simple.”

Megyn Kelly echoed similar sentiments, arguing that U.S. involvement serves foreign interests over domestic ones, especially after American service members were lost in the operation.

Kelly declared, “No one should have to die for a foreign country. I don’t think those four service members died for the United States.” She continued, “I think they died for Iran or for Israel.”

Emphasizing her view, Kelly said, “Our government’s job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It’s to look out for us. And this feels very much to me like it is clearly Israel’s war.”

President Trump addressed the criticism head-on, reaffirming that his actions align with MAGA’s core mission of keeping America safe and strong.

I think that MAGA is Trump — MAGA’s not the other two,” Trump said, referring to Kelly and Carlson. “MAGA wants to see our country thrive and be safe. And MAGA loves what I’m doing — every aspect of it. This is a detour that we have to take in order to keep our country safe and keep other countries safe, frankly.”

On Carlson specifically, Trump noted, “(Tucker) can say whatever he wants; it has no impact on me.”

Regarding Kelly, Trump pointed out her past opposition: “Megyn was opposed to me for years when I ran the first time and nothing stopped me. And so, you know, some people are against — and they always come back. She came all the way back. But now I guess she maybe doesn’t like the idea of this war, but I do because I have to keep nuclear weapons out of the hands of the Iranians.”

Trump also urged Kelly to “study her history book a little bit,” underscoring the historical dangers of appeasing regimes like Iran.

These remarks came amid broader pushback from the administration, with officials like JD Vance and Pete Hegseth clarifying that the operation is not a repeat of endless wars in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The strikes, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, were based on intelligence indicating imminent Iranian threats, including potential missile strikes on U.S. targets—intelligence that critics including Carlson and Kelly have downplayed without access to classified briefings.

Debates in conservative media reveal splits on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, with some emphasizing risks of escalation and others focusing on preventing potential threats.

Critics argue that involvement could draw America into prolonged conflicts, echoing past interventions, while supporters see it as a necessary step to curb nuclear proliferation.

As the Republican Party approaches midterms, these differing perspectives challenge internal unity, balancing calls for restraint against arguments for decisive action.

In broader terms, the Iran operation highlights ongoing discussions in U.S. politics about the role of military engagement in maintaining global stability.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com