韩国前总统尹锡悦因领导叛乱被判终身监禁。
South Korean ex president Yoon Suk Yeol jailed for life for leading insurrection

原始链接: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/feb/19/yoon-suk-yeol-sentenced-to-life-in-prison-for-leading-insurrection-in-south-korea

## 韩国前总统被判无期徒刑 韩国前总统尹锡悦因被判于2024年12月领导叛乱,被判处无期徒刑并强制劳动。这是韩国民选总统首次被判处最高刑罚。 法院认定尹锡悦宣布戒严——企图派遣军队到国民议会逮捕政治对手——是蓄意破坏宪法秩序。检方曾寻求判处死刑,指控其“严重破坏宪法秩序”,但法院考虑到有限的计划以及避免过度武力的尝试等减缓因素。 判决在一系列快速事件之后发生:议员推翻了戒严令,尹锡悦遭到弹劾,随后被宪法法院罢免。包括前部长在内的几名共同被告也受到了长期监禁的判决。 尹锡悦的法律团队谴责该裁决为“政治审判”,并誓言上诉,而支持者则表示愤怒。尽管韩国有总统赦免的历史,但此次定罪对该国民主来说是一个重要时刻,此前曾被描述为数十年来最严重的威胁。尹锡悦还面临进一步的刑事审判,包括叛国罪指控。

## 韩国前总统被判终身监禁 韩国前总统尹锡悦因领导叛乱未遂而被判处终身监禁。事件源于医学院招生名额增加的争议——此举旨在应对人口结构变化,但遭到医疗界反对,他们担心这会导致薪资下降,并因此举行了持续数月的罢工。 尹锡悦的回应是宣布戒严,试图暂停国民议会,下令逮捕大量政治对手,并限制媒体自由。虽然部分命令并未完全执行,但其行为已对民主进程构成严重挑战。值得注意的是,议会成员绕过军事封锁,否决了戒严令。 此案凸显了民主的脆弱性以及维护法治的重要性。评论员指出,韩国对专制主义的强烈抵制,与其他国家(包括美国)形成对比,在这些国家,类似行为面临的后果并不那么严重。尽管刑期严厉,但历史先例表明,未来可能出现赦免,就像之前韩国总统的情况一样。
相关文章

原文

A South Korean court has sentenced the former president Yoon Suk Yeol to life imprisonment with labour over his failed martial law declaration in December 2024, finding him guilty of leading an insurrection and making him the first elected head of state in the country’s democratic era to receive the maximum custodial sentence.

The Seoul central district court found that Yoon’s declaration of martial law on 3 December 2024 constituted insurrection, carried out with the intent to disrupt the constitutional order.

Judge Jee Kui-youn said the purpose was “to send troops to the national assembly to blockade the assembly hall and arrest key figures, including the assembly speaker and party leaders, thereby preventing lawmakers from gathering to deliberate or vote”.

South Korea's president declares martial law – video

In sentencing Yoon on Thursday, the court pointed to his lack of apology throughout the proceedings, his unjustified refusal to attend hearings, and the massive social costs his actions inflicted on South Korean society.

The court said the martial law greatly damaged the political neutrality of the military and police and caused South Korea’s political standing and credibility in the international community to decline, leaving society “politically divided and experiencing extreme confrontation”.

The court opted for life imprisonment over the death penalty, noting that while the crime was grave, Yoon’s planning did not appear meticulous, he had attempted to limit the use of physical force, and most of his plans ultimately failed.

In a historical digression, the judge traced the history of insurrection law and cited the 1649 execution of England’s Charles I, who led troops into parliament, to establish that even heads of state can commit insurrection by attacking the legislature.

Crowds outside the court await the verdict. Photograph: Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters

The verdict was broadcast live on national television, capturing Yoon briefly smiling on arrival and later displaying no visible reaction as the sentence was delivered.

Under South Korean law, the charge of leading an insurrection carries three possible penalties: death, life imprisonment with labour, or life imprisonment without labour.

Prosecutors had sought the death penalty, arguing that Yoon committed “a grave destruction of constitutional order” by mobilising troops to surround parliament and attempting to arrest political opponents during the six-hour crisis.

The verdict came 14 months after events that marked the most serious threat to South Korea’s democracy in decades.

The charges stem from events on the night of 3 December 2024, when prosecutors said Yoon attempted to use military force to paralyse the legislature, arrest political opponents and seize control of the national election commission. Yoon claimed he was rooting out “anti-state forces” and alleged election fraud without providing evidence.

How the South Korean president's martial law declaration unfolded – video

Within hours of the declaration, 190 lawmakers broke through military and police cordons to pass an emergency resolution lifting martial law. Parliament impeached Yoon within 11 days, and the constitutional court removed him from office four months later.

Outside the courthouse, hundreds of Yoon supporters – waving South Korean and US flags and chanting “Yoon again” – initially cheered when the judge dismissed some prosecution evidence but turned hostile as the ruling progressed. Some supporters shouted “political judge, step down” and hurled profanities at journalists.

When the sentence was announced, some collapsed in tears, crying “the country is finished”. About 500 metres away, progressive groups erupted in cheers and embraced one another, though some expressed disappointment the death penalty had not been imposed.

Yoon faces six additional criminal trials, two of which arise from the martial law crisis, including a treason charge alleging that he ordered drone incursions into North Korean airspace in an attempt to provoke a confrontation that could justify military rule. He has already been sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for obstructing his own arrest.

Protesters in Seoul hold a chained effigy depicting Yoon Suk Yeol during a rally calling for his resignation, in December 2024. Photograph: Han Myung-Gu/EPA

Thursday’s verdict follows a series of related rulings that formally established the events of 3 December constituted an insurrection.

In January, the former prime minister Han Duck-soo was handed a 23-year prison sentence in a ruling that described the martial law attempt as a “self-coup” by elected power that was more dangerous than traditional uprisings. The sentence far exceeded prosecutors’ 15-year demand, indicating judicial willingness to impose severe penalties.

On 12 February, the former interior minister Lee Sang-min was jailed for seven years for his role in the insurrection, including relaying Yoon’s orders to cut power and water to media outlets.

Legal experts said the rulings created a sentencing environment that made the most severe punishment more likely in Yoon’s case.

The court also sentenced seven co-defendants: Kim Yong-hyun, the former defence minister, to 30 years; Noh Sang-won, a former intelligence commander, to 18 years; Cho Ji-ho, the former police chief, to 12 years; and Kim Bong-sik, the former Seoul police chief, to 10 years. Mok Hyun-tae, a police commander, received three years. Two defendants, Kim Yong-gun and Yoon Seung-young, were acquitted.

An anti-Yoon protester dressed as Batman in Seoul last April. Photograph: Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images

Yoon’s legal team released a statement calling the verdict “a predetermined conclusion” and a “show trial”, saying they could not bring themselves to respect the judgment.

They accused the judiciary of “kneeling to incited public opinion and political power” and applying double standards, pointing to President Lee Jae Myung’s suspended trials and opposition politicians acquitted on illegal evidence grounds.

The legal team vowed to fight “to the end”, saying truth would eventually be revealed “in the court of history”. Yoon is expected to appeal.

Life imprisonment carries no fixed release date, with parole theoretically possible after 20 years, on demonstration of good conduct and remorse.

Park Geun-hye arrives at a court in Seoul in August 2017. Photograph: Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters

The former president Park Geun-hye was initially sentenced to a combined 32 years in prison for corruption and related offences in 2018. The term was later reduced on appeal and ultimately erased by a presidential pardon in 2021.

In 1996, the military dictators Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo received death and 22-and-a-half-year sentences, respectively, for their roles in a 1979 coup and subsequent massacre in Gwangju. The sentences were later reduced on appeal, and both men were eventually pardoned.

Every South Korean president who has served a prison sentence has ultimately been pardoned.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com