英国广告因展示黑人骚扰者而被禁,但多则展示白人骚扰者的广告却没问题。
UK Ad Banned For Showing Black Harasser; Multiple Ads With White Harassers Were Just Fine

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/uk-ad-banned-showing-black-harasser-multiple-ads-white-harassers-were-just-fine

伦敦交通局(TfL)在其“像朋友一样行动”宣传活动中移除了一个广告——该活动旨在鼓励干预骚扰行为——原因是收到了一起投诉,认为该广告带有种族刻板印象。该广告描绘了一名黑人青少年在公交车上对一名白人女孩进行言语骚扰。广告标准管理局(ASA)裁定,这种孤立的描绘强化了将黑人男性与威胁行为联系起来的负面刻板印象。 然而,TfL之前批准了多则广告,其中展示了*白人*男性作为施暴者,针对不同的受害者。这种差异凸显了一种双重标准,文章认为,将黑人描绘成施暴者被认为不可接受,而涉及白人的类似描绘则不受限制。 TfL为此道歉,表示该广告单独来看未能达到其标准,但为该活动整体的多样性进行了辩护。批评人士认为,这表明媒体受到“觉醒”思想的压制,压制了对骚扰行为的诚实描绘,并可能通过优先考虑叙事而非现实来危及弱势群体。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

In a glaring display of selective outrage, Transport for London (TfL) has yanked an advert depicting a black teenager harassing a white girl on a bus – all because of a single complaint crying “racial stereotypes.” Meanwhile, multiple past ads, all featuring white men as the aggressors, were approved, exposing the double standards that shield uncomfortable realities from public view.

The controversial ad was part of TfL’s “Act Like a Friend” campaign, aimed at encouraging bystanders to intervene in cases of sexual harassment or ‘hate crimes’ on public transport.

In the short clip, a black teenage boy verbally harasses a young white girl, with his white friend sitting nearby, effectively boxing her in. But according to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), this portrayal – when viewed in isolation – “reinforced a negative racial stereotype” associating black males with threatening behavior.

The ASA’s ruling came after just one complaint, deeming the ad “irresponsible” and likely to cause “serious offence.”

They stated: “We understood there was a negative racial stereotype based on the association between black males, including teenagers, and threatening behaviour. […] The ad, when seen in isolation, had the effect of perpetuating a negative racial stereotype about black men as perpetrators of threatening behaviour.”

TfL was ordered to ensure future ads avoid such “harmful stereotypes.”

TfL even defended the campaign, noting it featured a diverse range of scenarios to reflect London’s population. Other cut-downs included a white male committing a hate crime against a black woman and another white male targeting a white male victim.

Ah yes, but any instance of a black person being the aggressor must be purged. That is not allowed, because clearly it NEVER happens in London and it’s racist. OK?

TfL issued a an apology, with a spokeswoman remarking “Our aim is to ensure that our advertising reflects London’s diverse population and does not perpetuate any stereotypes. […] We’re sorry that this social media advert […] falls below our usual high standards when viewed in isolation.”

Of course, similar government anti-harassment ads have repeatedly cast white men as the sole perpetrators, with diverse victims – and that seems to be just fine.

White villains are fair game, but anything else gets labeled a “negative racial stereotype.”

This episode underscores the woke stranglehold on media and advertising. In a city where harassment reports surge amid unchecked borders, honest campaigns should be encouraged, not censored. The left’s obsession with “equity” blinds them to actual threats, leaving women – especially native Brits – more vulnerable.

TfL’s quick capitulation to one complaint shows how easily truth is suppressed. If ads with white harassers face no backlash, why the uproar here? It’s a clear case of protecting narratives over people.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Loading recommendations...

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com