这篇文章会是压垮骆驼的最后一根稻草吗?
Will This Atlantic Hit Piece Be The Final Straw?

原始链接: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/will-atlantic-hit-piece-be-final-straw

## 大西洋杂志因卡什·帕特尔(Kash Patel)事件面临法律诉讼 大西洋杂志因发表一篇极具争议的文章,指控联邦调查局局长卡什·帕特尔不当行为,而面临联邦调查局的潜在诉讼。该文章声称帕特尔因临时计算机访问问题而惊慌失措,虚假宣布自己被解雇,并进一步指控其过度饮酒和提出可疑的安全要求。 在文章发表*之前*,联邦调查局坚决否认了所有指控,律师已发出警告,如果文章发表将采取法律行动——但文章还是发表了。帕特尔本人也公开驳斥了这些指控。值得注意的是,其他新闻媒体也调查了相同的线索,但由于缺乏核实而拒绝发表。 这起事件重现了大西洋杂志过去的一些争议,包括关于特朗普总统和军事墓地的争议文章。批评人士认为该媒体一贯发表未经证实的抹黑文章,依靠成为唯一发布者的策略来为可疑的主张增加可信度。白宫官员和代理司法部长已公开为帕特尔辩护,强调他的奉献精神和成就。

相关文章

原文

Authored by Matt Margolis via PJMedia.com,

The Atlantic has a well-documented history of publishing fake hit pieces about President Donald Trump and his administration, and one wonders how many more hoaxes they can run before they get in real trouble.

Its latest effort targeting FBI Director Kash Patel may be its most reckless yet — and this time, the bureau is fighting back with lawyers.

The piece, written by reporters Sarah Fitzpatrick and Jonathan Lemire, claims that on Friday, April 10, Patel struggled to log into an internal FBI computer system while wrapping up his workday.

He quickly became convinced that he had been locked out, and he panicked, frantically calling aides and allies to announce that he had been fired by the White House, according to nine people familiar with his outreach. Two of these people described his behavior as a “freak-out.”

Patel oversees an agency that employs roughly 38,000 people, including many who are trained to investigate and verify information that can be presented under oath in a court of law. News of his emotional outburst ricocheted through the bureau, prompting chatter among officials and, in some corners of the building, expressions of relief. The White House fielded calls from the bureau and from members of Congress asking who was now in charge of the FBI.

It turned out that the answer was still Patel. He had not been fired. The access problem, two people familiar with the matter said, appears to have been a technical error, and it was quickly resolved.

The piece didn't stop there. It also alleged Patel has been plagued by "bouts of excessive drinking," claiming members of his security detail had trouble waking him on multiple occasions because he was seemingly intoxicated. It further alleged that breaching equipment — the kind used by SWAT and hostage-rescue teams — was requested last year because Patel had been unreachable behind locked doors.

The FBI denied every word of it before the article ever went live. Attorney Jesse Binnall sent a formal letter to The Atlantic and Fitzpatrick ahead of publication, putting them on notice that the claims were "categorically false and defamatory."

The bureau's response was even more direct: "Print it, all false, I'll see you in court — bring your checkbook."

They printed it anyway.

Late Friday night, Patel fired back on X.

It's worth noting that The Atlantic was apparently the only outlet willing to run this story. Other D.C. reporters chased the same tips and couldn't verify them. They passed. The Atlantic published it. And now they're going to be sued.

This is what The Atlantic does. They publish outlandish and bogus stories that no other outlet will touch, which accomplishes the goal of giving Democrats and their supporters reason to insist the stories are true. The outlet’s hoax piece alleging Trump didn’t want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 because the troops there who died in battle were “losers” and “suckers” was disputed by over a dozen witnesses. Yet, the left still insists it happened—even after Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, admitted it could have been wrong.

Sarah Fitzpatrick herself has a history of publishing bogus hit pieces lacking sources and corroboration.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche both publicly defended Patel. Blanche praised Patel, noting he "has accomplished more in 14 months than the previous administration did in four years." FBI spokesperson Erica Knight added that since being sworn in, Patel has taken just 17 days off — roughly half the time taken by former directors James Comey and Christopher Wray over comparable stretches.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com