OpenAI的失势,以及投资者涌向Anthropic。
OpenAI's fall from grace as investors race to Anthropic

原始链接: https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-04-01/openais-shocking-fall-from-grace-as-investors-race-to-anthropic

投资者兴趣正在迅速从OpenAI转向其竞争对手Anthropic,导致OpenAI的股票在二级市场变得难以出售。投资者正寻求抛售约6亿美元的OpenAI股票,但需求疲软,与Anthropic准备投资的20亿美元形成鲜明对比。 这种转变源于投资者认为Anthropic的风险回报更好,其3800亿美元的估值落后于OpenAI的8520亿美元,表明具有更大的增长潜力。Anthropic还在利润丰厚的企业市场中获得进展,而人们对OpenAI的高运营成本和较慢的企业采用率越来越担忧。 尽管OpenAI完成了一轮规模庞大的1220亿美元融资,但二级市场活动却讲述了不同的故事。银行甚至为OpenAI股票免除费用,而对Anthropic股票则保持收费,这表明对后者的信心。尽管两家公司都面临挑战——Anthropic面临法律纠纷和安全漏洞——但投资者目前的偏好是Anthropic的发展轨迹。

## OpenAI 的失误与 Anthropic 的崛起 最近 Hacker News 上的讨论表明,投资者情绪从 OpenAI 转向 Anthropic,尽管 OpenAI 最初在人工智能竞赛中处于领先地位。 尽管 OpenAI 曾经凭借其卓越的技术和品牌认知度占据主导地位,但批评人士认为他们变得自满,创新速度不够快——尤其是在代码代理方面——并且处理公共关系不当。 OpenAI 的领导层和战略决策动摇了投资者的信心,导致人们认为缺乏纪律,盈利道路值得怀疑。 这推动了人们对 Anthropic 的兴趣,Anthropic 正在获得开发者的青睐,尤其是在其编码能力(Claude Code)方面。 然而,关于两种模型的真实质量存在争议。 有些人认为 Claude 被高估了,而另一些人则赞扬其性能。 人们仍然担心 Anthropic 自身的伦理考量和炒作的可能性。 最终,两家公司的长期成功取决于实现盈利和应对快速变化的市场,该市场可能受到开源替代方案和维持大规模人工智能基础设施的巨大成本的威胁。 讨论还指出了人工智能领域估值膨胀的总体趋势以及市场可能出现的修正。
相关文章

原文

OpenAI shares have fallen out of favor on the secondary market — in some cases, becoming almost impossible to unload — as investors pivot quickly to Anthropic, its biggest competitor.

Even as OpenAI raced in recent months to raise tens of billions of dollars, Next Round Capital founder Ken Smythe said his secondary marketplace was seeing a drop in demand for shares of the artificial intelligence giant. About a half-dozen institutional investors — including hedge funds and venture capital firms that hold large stakes — approached his company in recent weeks looking to sell about $600 million of OpenAI shares.

Last year, they would have been snatched up within days. But now, no one’s biting.

“We literally couldn’t find anyone in our pool of hundreds of institutional investors to take these shares,” said Smythe, whose firm has handled $2.5 billion of transactions. Meanwhile, “buyers have indicated they have $2 billion of cash ready to deploy into Anthropic.”

Other marketplaces are also seeing record demand for Anthropic, including Augment and Hiive. The large gap between OpenAI’s $852-billion valuation and Anthropic’s $380 billion has investors rushing to grab equity in the latter before it rises, according to Augment co-founder Adam Crawley.

“It’s just better risk-reward right now,” he said. “People are betting that Anthropic’s valuation will catch up with OpenAI’s. But if you buy OpenAI shares, it’s less clear what the return will be in the near term.”

Anthropic and OpenAI don’t allow investors to trade shares on the secondary market without their permission. Still, access to the shares is available on many platforms as investors sell their interests through other mechanisms such as special-purpose vehicles.

“OpenAI does not endorse or participate in any of these transactions, which are a violation of our transfer restrictions and may result in the invalidation of the underlying equity,” the firm wrote on its website.

Banks including Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. have begun offering OpenAI shares to wealth clients without charging carry fees, according to a person familiar with the matter. Meanwhile, Goldman is charging its usual carry for clients interested in Anthropic. That fee is often roughly 15% to 20% of profits.

Representatives for the banks declined to comment. OpenAI and Anthropic didn’t comment.

On Tuesday, OpenAI announced it had put the finishing touches on its largest-ever fundraising, drawing $122 billion in backing from tech giants, venture capital funds and retail investors alike.

Primary fundraising and secondary sales don’t always follow the same playbook. In fundraising rounds, existing investors are often offered the chance to buy more shares to maintain their stakes, and instead of saying no — which founders may not like — they can buy in and then sell some of that exposure on the secondary market.

Both AI firms have grown rapidly in recent years, particularly after OpenAI’s 2022 debut of ChatGPT and Anthropic’s subsequent launch of Claude. Both companies are weighing plans to go public, with OpenAI’s listing expected as early as this year.

Some investors have grown cautious over OpenAI’s soaring operating costs. The company has committed to spend far more than Anthropic on infrastructure to support its AI ambitions in coming years. And while OpenAI touts a strong consumer base, it’s moving slowly on capturing more lucrative enterprise clients. Anthropic, meanwhile, has dominated that higher-margin market and, as a result, its growth trajectory appears to be stronger than OpenAI’s, Crawley said.

Meanwhile, Anthropic has other challenges. It’s suing the U.S. Department of Defense after the Pentagon designated the company a supply-chain risk and ordered a ban on government entities using its technology. And just this week, Anthropic had its second security slip-up in a matter of days, when it inadvertently released internal source code behind Claude.

Next Round sees bids for OpenAI coming in at a valuation of about $765 billion, a 10% discount from the previous $850 billion.

“The market is much more in demand for Anthropic,” Augment’s Crawley said.

His firm and Next Round are both seeing huge bids for Anthropic that value it at roughly $600 billion, more than 50% higher than its previous funding round. Meanwhile, Hiive has registered more than $1.6 billion of demand for Anthropic shares, also at a premium, said co-founder Prab Rattan.

“The demand is one of the highest we’ve ever seen,” Crawley said. “It’s essentially unlimited interest.”

Parmar writes for Bloomberg.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com