软件从未有过灵魂。
Software never had a soul

原始链接: https://www.jmduke.com/posts/software-never-had-a-soul.html

卢里奥最近感叹现代网络似乎失去了个性,认为为了规模化优化导致了平庸、同质化的体验。他表达了一种怀旧的愿望,想要“恢复”过去古怪、个性化的网络。 然而,作者强烈不同意。他们认为个人网站并没有*消失*,而是蓬勃发展——这得益于越来越容易获得的工具,这些工具赋予个人创造独特在线空间的能力。问题不在于缺乏工具,而是对目的的误解。 与专注于效率的企业网站不同,个人网站*应该*是富有表现力和个性化的。期望像IDE这样的软件拥有“灵魂”是错误的;功能应该优先考虑效率,而个性应该在其他地方寻找。作者强调,创造独特的东西比以往任何时候都更容易,个人网站充满活力的关键在于真诚的意图,而不是对过去的怀念。

## 软件与互联网流失的“灵魂” 一篇 jmduke.com 文章引发了 Hacker News 的讨论,探讨了现代软件和互联网缺乏过去那种“灵魂”的感觉。这种“灵魂”归因于令人喜爱的怪癖、触觉工艺(如汽车中的模拟仪表盘),以及理解和修改系统所带来的有益挑战——这些在今天抛光、简化的体验中大多消失了。 许多评论者认为,这不仅仅是技术问题,而是关于背景和创造。互联网从一个小型、可访问的“未开发国家”转变为由大型公司控制分发和体验的平台,是关键因素。如今的便捷访问是以牺牲自由和个性为代价的,将用户变成了被算法“榨取”内容的消费者。 虽然一些人哀叹这种损失,但另一些人认为这是一种选择,以及一场集体的“中年危机”——未能适应并利用仍然可用的强大工具来创造独立体验。这场讨论凸显了对过去更具吸引力、动手操作的时代的怀旧之情,以及现代技术(包括人工智能)所提供的重建那种创造精神的潜力之间的紧张关系。
相关文章

原文

Ryo Lu recently wrote:

The web was the same. Personal sites were genuinely personal. Blogs felt like letters. Forums had regulars. You knew who made what. The internet had neighborhoods, and each one felt different.

Nothing was optimized for scale. Things were made by people who loved what they were making.

Somewhere along the way, we traded all of that for growth. A/B tests flattened the edges. Design systems standardized the personality out. Everything got faster, smoother, more consistent — and somehow less interesting. The quirks were removed because they didn't test well. The warmth got cut because it wasn't measurable. We optimized our way into a world of things that work perfectly and feel like nothing.

I've been turning this over in my head for a day or so, trying to pinpoint why it didn't sit well with me.

I think it's this: the narrative would have you believe that the personal web — replete with the kind of rococo and flourish that "doesn't scale" — is gone, and the mission falls on Us to bring it back. To me, this is the same kind of thinking that complains about how all the music on the radio today is overproduced poppy garbage, or that the only films coming out are high-budget, low-value, extended universe IP flicks. It is simply untrue, but the ease with which Ryo goes back and forth from talking about "software" to talking about "products" gives away the game.

I do not want my IDE to "have a soul". It is an IDE! I want it to be extremely efficient and ergonomic, and if that's at the expense of whimsy then good. I get whimsy from many other things in my life: I do not expect my OXO citrus press to contain delightful microinteractions, and Cursor (for which Ryo works) is closer to the business of making citrus presses than it is to the business of making delicious home-cooked meals.

Technology progresses at an exhilarating pace of monotonic improvement. It has never been faster, easier, or cheaper to build something unique and have it available for the entire world to see. Here are some examples I came up with in thirty seconds:

(blogroll.org has a great list of these, too.)

None of these are for companies. They are all personal websites, because the goal of a personal website is distinct from that of a corporate website — and technology has advanced such that the difference between the two is both meaningful and palpable. The personal web is not dead; it is thriving, and it is thriving precisely because the tools have gotten better, not in spite of it.


If you find yourself pining for yesteryear, remember that you do not need a time machine. You do not even need better or faster tools. You just need to really mean it.

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com