在界限被跨越之前设定它。
Set the Line Before It's Crossed

原始链接: https://nomagicpill.substack.com/p/set-the-line-before-its-crossed

## 设置与执行个人边界:界限与行动 本文概述了主动定义个人边界的重要性——分为软性、坚定性和硬性三种类型——并持续执行。大多数人是被动地运作,在界限被跨越*之后*才决定什么是可接受的,导致“偏差常态化”,界限逐渐瓦解。这可能会产生有害的后果,例如虐待关系和价值观妥协。 关键在于预先定义界限、每个级别的标准(软性作为硬性的警告),以及相应的行动。这创造了一种默认的反应,防止了合理化或延迟行动。至关重要的是,当界限被跨越时*必须*采取行动,否则该界限将毫无意义。 有效的实施包括清晰地传达这些界限并建立问责制——可能通过经济成本、值得信赖的伙伴,甚至自动化来实现。提供的例子包括回应不尊重的评论、处理工作中不道德的要求,甚至为潜在的政治不稳定做计划。最终,主动设置和执行边界可以保护福祉,并防止逐渐接受不可接受的行为。

## 设定边界:摘要 这次Hacker News讨论围绕一篇Substack文章,该文章提倡明确个人“底线”——我们拒绝让别人跨越的界限。虽然核心理念引起一些人的共鸣,但讨论串揭示了细微的观点。 许多人同意,在低风险情况下*练习*设定边界,对于在更困难的情况下取得成功至关重要。然而,另一些人质疑僵硬底线的价值,认为它们会阻碍适应性并损害关系。有些人认为,专注于坚定的原则,而不是僵化的规则,更有效。 一个关键的争论点在于设定底线是否本质上是积极的。人们担心潜在的僵化,以及考虑具体情况的重要性——例如,零加薪政策在拥有大量股票期权的情况下可能是可以接受的。 还有人指出,边界不是最后通牒,而是关于*你*行为的声明。 最终,这场讨论突出了人际交往的复杂性,并表明有效的边界是灵活、动态的,并且取决于个人情况和关系,而不是严格的、预先定义的规则。
相关文章

原文

Three types of lines exist in the policy and behavior sense:

  • Soft: These are okay to cross, but not preferable. There may or may not be a tangible action taken afterwards, but the person whose line was crossed should take note.

  • Firm: These are somewhere between soft and hard lines and should result in some tangible action being taken that is less drastic than the hard line.

  • Hard: These are not okay to cross and (should) result in some tangible action being taken that is more drastic than the firm line.

Most lines are rarely set and rarely thought about in detail. Most line setters use the good ol’ “I know it when I see it” test, waiting for something to happen before they decide what to do. This is a poor practice because of the pernicious force known as normalization of deviance.

When lines aren’t set before they’re crossed, it forces a decision to be made at the time of crossing (if it can even be recognized that something was crossed!), during which many things can happen:

  • The line setter convinces themselves that the line wasn’t really crossed and everything is fine. This will land the setter in not-so-nice territory if this occurs enough times because the line effectively moves back each time.

    • Ex: Ruben, Lou’s boyfriend, playfully pinches her, then playfully punches her, then seriously pinches her, then seriously punches her, and so on. Each time she convinces herself that her domestic abuse line wasn’t crossed, ultimately leading to her getting full-on abused.

  • The line setter acknowledges the line was crossed, but because taking action is uncomfortable at the time of crossing, vows to wait until it happens a second time because the first time may have been a one-off. This increases the likelihood they give a third chance to the offense when/if they apply the same thought process to the second.

    • Ex: Diane blatantly lies and talks about Joe both behind his back and to his face. Joe explains away the behavior as Diane having a stressful time and continues being “friends”. Diane continues the behavior while Joe accepts and normalizes it as Diane’s personality. Joe’s self-esteem decreases as he continues to spend time with Diane.

  • The line setter acknowledges the line was crossed, but convinces themselves that the line really should’ve been just a teeny bit further when they originally set it.

    • Ex: Harlan’s original salary threshold for taking the Giving What We Can pledge was $100k/year, but now that he’s reached it, it feels a bit low. After all, he deserves to treat himself a bit more for all the hard work he put himself through to get to the coveted six-figure salary. Plus, he may have a baby in the next few years! And everyone knows how expensive babies are! Harlan resets his salary goal at $120k, which will be plenty when the time comes.

By setting a line and its corresponding action early, the action becomes the default until proven otherwise. This is similar to trigger-action plans.

Here’s the general process of setting a line:

  1. Figure out the general line. Whether it’s domestic abuse, talking smack, donating money, or rights being restricted or outright revoked, it must be defined.

  2. Define the criteria for both the soft, firm, and/or hard versions, but especially the hard. The soft line being crossed serves as a forewarning to the hard line being crossed, giving ample preparation time for if the hard line is eventually crossed. The criteria must be well-defined with little room for interpretation.

  3. Decide how many times each can be crossed before the action is taken. It’s fine to give someone a stern reminder that they crossed the line in case they forgot, weren’t aware of the line, weren’t aware that it was soft/firm/hard, etc. It’s not fine for it to happen more than the set number allows, especially if previous actions were taken.

  4. Define the actions for each line. This can also be done in conjunction with deciding the number of times it can be violated, since more drastic actions should have fewer subsequent violations and thus a lower number of allowable violations.

  5. Define what circumstances would have to be present for the action not to be taken. What evidence would it take to show that the hard line was crossed, but the action shouldn’t be taken? (This is a bit contradictory to how hard line is defined above, but the hard line action is simply the default, not a blind requirement that must be executed. Setters should double-check they didn’t miss something before taking the default action.)

  6. Communicate the lines and actions to people who either may be at risk of crossing them or will help with maintaining accountability of executing said actions.

  7. Prepare for taking the action when/if the time comes. Preparation may be mental, physical, or environmental.

The line means nothing—and in reality, is likely a large cost—if the action is never performed when it should be. Assuming the fourth and fifth steps are done honestly and comprehensively, it should be clear what decision needs to be made when the line is crossed.

Thus, an accountability method must be put in place to enforce the action being taken.

A few ideas that all rely on the honor system to some extent:

  • Require a cost greater than that of said action be paid. If the action costs $10, make the cost of not doing the action $20.

  • Publicly or privately announce the lines and ask a trusted person to be your accountability partner. They know your lines and make sure you follow through on the actions, else a cost will be incurred (see previous idea).

  • Automate the action. For example, write a script that looks to see if the friend who borrowed money ever paid it back by a certain date. If current_date > deadline_date & money_repaid = false, then send an automated email unfriending them.

Here are some hard line ideas and associated actions (in no particular order; assume the case is straightforward with no nuance):

  • Soft line: A government violates a law with the expectation that the lengthy legal process will allow them to reap the benefits before a ruling is made

  • Soft line action(s): Protest

  • Hard line: A government blatantly violates a constitutional amendment or refuses to comply with a court order

  • Hard line action(s): Apply for a visa or similar in another country

  • Soft line: A friend makes disparaging comments about you, but claims it’s “just a joke”

  • Soft line action(s): Tell them to not do that again, but continue being friends with them

  • Firm line: Boss makes an immoral or illegal request, but doesn’t retaliate when it’s refused

  • Firm line action(s): Submit a whistleblower complaint; submit an ethics violation with the company; begin a new job search; resign

  • Soft line: Weight above X

  • Soft line action(s): Begin weight loss actions (eating less, exercising more)

联系我们 contact @ memedata.com